ROCAS / BESS TECHNOLOGY

Upgrade the way you cool.

Direct cooling. Stronger thermal control. Better lifecycle potential. Discover what dielectric immersion can bring to your next BESS investment.

Traditional liquid cooling

Heat travels through a plate.

+ Established circuit. Broad supplier ecosystem.

− Indirect thermal contact; seals and plate contact need attention.

ROCAS dielectric immersion

Cooling reaches the cell surface.

+ Direct heat pickup. Broad contact supports thermal uniformity.

− Fluid compatibility, circulation and condition must be managed.

AI-generated concept renderings; illustrative architecture, not product photographs.

Technical comparison

The difference starts at the cell.

Design decisionTraditional liquid coolingROCAS dielectric immersion
Heat transferCell → interface → plate → coolant.Cell surface → dielectric fluid.
Temperature uniformityDepends on plate contact and flow distribution.Broad fluid contact supports more uniform temperatures.
Hot spotsHeat must travel to the cooled contact area.Direct heat pickup helps manage local hot spots.
Electrical insulationCoolant stays inside a sealed plate circuit.Electrically insulating fluid surrounds the cells.
Fire protectionPlate heat removal plus BMS and system protection.Direct heat absorption can help limit propagation.
Service requirementsCoolant, pumps, seals, circuit integrity and plate contact.Fluid condition, compatible seals, circulation and gas management.
Illustrative 0.5C scenario

Make every cycle count.

Look beyond the purchase price. Compare capital over the operating life.

Initial CAPEX

EUR / MWh

Traditional liquid cooling170,000
ROCAS dielectric immersion200,000
+17.6%

Cycle-life assumption

Equivalent full cycles

Traditional liquid cooling7,000
ROCAS dielectric immersion12,000
+71.4%

Capital per cycle

EUR / initial MWh / EFC

Traditional liquid cooling24.29
ROCAS dielectric immersion16.67
−31.4%

Illustrative assumptions, not guaranteed product performance. CAPEX / EFC: 170,000 / 7,000 = 24.29; 200,000 / 12,000 = 16.67. Comparable qualification and equal scope assumed. Excludes energy, losses, OPEX, augmentation and discounting; this is not full LCOS. Actual life depends on duty cycle, calendar ageing and end-of-life criteria.

ROCAS ENERGY / FILM

See the technology in action.

Video hosted on Google Drive. Open video in a new tab ↗

Safety & business continuity

Fire risk is an investment risk.

A fire can damage assets, stop dispatch and disrupt the site. Evaluate protection before you buy.

Stâlpu, Romania — battery fire
26–27 August 2026

Stâlpu, Romania

A battery-storage hall fire required a difficult, prolonged intervention. IGSU did not establish the cause in this release.

Incident report ↗DSU / IGSU
Czajków, Poland — battery fire
7 May 2026

Czajków, Poland

A container battery fire prompted continued cooling, thermal monitoring and evacuation of nearby people.

Incident report ↗PSP Poznań
Victoria Big Battery — battery fire
30 July 2021

Victoria Big Battery

Fire spread to a neighbouring Megapack during commissioning. Investigators identified a probable coolant leak and electrical faults.

Incident report ↗FRV / ABC; FEI / ESRG

Real incidents illustrate BESS fire exposure, not a controlled comparison of cooling methods. Cooling configurations at Stâlpu and Czajków are not established here. Immersion does not guarantee zero fire risk. Images and credits from the supplied ROCAS safety presentation.

Cell-level thermal control

Direct fluid contact helps remove heat and manage hot spots.

Layered protection

Combine immersion with BMS, detection, gas management and fire protection.

System-level validation

Select tested configurations, documented operating limits and a defined maintenance plan.

Your next BESS starts with a better comparison.

Discuss the right architecture for your power, capacity and operating strategy.