
Stâlpu, Romania
A battery-storage hall fire required a difficult, prolonged intervention. IGSU did not establish the cause in this release.
Incident reportDSU / IGSU
How ROCAS immersion cooling works, how it compares with cold-plate liquid cooling, and why thermal control belongs in the investment decision.
Three ways to remove heat from a battery module. AI-generated concept renderings; illustrative architecture, not product photographs.



| Design decision | Cold-plate liquid cooling | ROCAS dielectric immersion |
|---|---|---|
| Heat transfer | Cell to interface to plate to coolant. | Cell surface to dielectric fluid. |
| Temperature uniformity | Depends on plate contact and flow distribution. | Broad fluid contact supports more uniform temperatures. |
| Hot spots | Heat must travel to the cooled contact area. | Direct heat pickup helps manage local hot spots. |
| Electrical insulation | Coolant stays inside a sealed plate circuit. | Electrically insulating fluid surrounds the cells. |
| Fire protection | Plate heat removal plus BMS and system protection. | Direct heat absorption can help limit propagation. |
| Service requirements | Coolant, pumps, seals, circuit integrity and plate contact. | Fluid condition, compatible seals, circulation and gas management. |
Battery packs heat up as current flows through them, so every pack needs cooling. In a ROCAS immersion system the LFP cells sit in a dielectric fluid that does not conduct electricity. The fluid takes heat directly from the cell surface, helps limit thermal propagation between cells and keeps cell temperatures stable, which supports a longer cycle life.
The design uses two fluids. Besides the dielectric fluid, a water-glycol circuit handles extreme ambient temperatures. Two loop variants are available: the dielectric fluid circulates directly to the chiller and is cooled there, or it stays inside the pack and is cooled by the water-glycol circuit.
Look beyond the purchase price and compare the capital allocated to each cycle over the operating life. Illustrative 0.5C scenario.
EUR per MWh
+17.6%
Equivalent full cycles
+71.4%
EUR per initial MWh per cycle
−31.4%
Illustrative assumptions, not guaranteed product performance. CAPEX per cycle: 170,000 / 7,000 = 24.29 and 200,000 / 12,000 = 16.67. Comparable qualification and equal scope assumed. Excludes energy, losses, OPEX, augmentation and discounting, so this is not a full LCOS. Actual life depends on duty cycle, calendar ageing and end-of-life criteria. The cycle-life values are scenario assumptions: the ROCAS datasheets rate the liquid-cooled models at 8,000 cycles (0.5P, 25 ±2°C, 70% SOH) and the immersion models at 10,000 cycles, with test conditions stated in the project offer.
A fire can damage assets, stop dispatch and disrupt the site. Evaluate protection before you buy.

A battery-storage hall fire required a difficult, prolonged intervention. IGSU did not establish the cause in this release.
Incident reportDSU / IGSU

A container battery fire prompted continued cooling, thermal monitoring and the evacuation of nearby people.
Incident reportPSP Poznań

Fire spread to a neighbouring Megapack during commissioning. Investigators identified a probable coolant leak and electrical faults.
Incident reportPhoto: FRV / ABC; findings: Energy Safe Victoria
Real incidents illustrate BESS fire exposure; they are not a controlled comparison of cooling methods. The cooling configurations at Stâlpu and Czajków are not established here. Immersion does not guarantee zero fire risk. Images and credits from the ROCAS safety presentation.
Direct fluid contact helps remove heat and manage hot spots.
Combine immersion with BMS, detection, gas management and fire suppression.
Select tested configurations, documented operating limits and a defined maintenance plan.
A three-page summary of the comparison, the lifecycle scenario and the safety case.
Discuss the right architecture for your power, capacity and operating strategy.